Get Money Out of Politics
Residents deserve elected officials who answer to the public—not corporations, developers, data center companies, utilities, or businesses seeking favorable government decisions.


Public office should never be for sale.
Introduction
Campaign contributions do not automatically prove that an elected official has done anything wrong. But when businesses and individuals with major financial interests before the government give large amounts of money to the people making those decisions, the public has every right to ask questions. The appearance of influence can be almost as damaging as actual influence. Residents should never have to wonder whether a vote was based on the public interest or on who helped finance a campaign.
Jon will not accept donations from businesses. His campaign is being built through residents, volunteers, and individual supporters because public trust matters.


What Jon Supports
Reject Corporate and Business Donations


Corporations
Developers
Data center companies
Utility companies

Campaigns should be funded by people, not by those seeking special favors.
Any business
Business PAC’s
Special interests
A contribution may be legal and still create a reasonable concern about influence.
Make Campaign Finance Easier to Understand


Clear disclosure of all contributions and expenditures
Searchable information in plain language
Explanations of PAC's and political committees
Transparency around bundled contributions
Disclosure of independent expenditures

Campaign finance information is public, but it is not always easy for residents to interpret.
Encourage Voters to Follow the Money


What business or industry are they connected to?
Do they have zoning or land-use matters before the county?
Are multiple donors tied to the same company?
Did contributions occur near important decisions?
How has your representative voted on these issues?

Residents should visit www.vpap.org and review campaign finance reports for every candidate and elected official to see who is taking data center and developer money.
Informed public scrutiny is not an accusation - it's how accountability and trust are built.
Ask Yourself:
Stronger Conflict-of-Interest Rules


Stronger disclosure of potential conflicts
Recusal when appropriate
Ethics training and guidance for all officials
Public explanations of relevant relationships
Independent review of serious ethics concerns

Residents deserve clear standards when elected officials have financial, professional, or political relationships connected to a decision.
Government earns trust by being open before questions become controversies.
Transparency Before Major Decisions


Land-use applications
Rezoning requests
Data center proposals
Public contracts

Residents deserve full transparency before decisions that shape our future.
Tax incentives
Utility projects
Major capital investments
Residents should know who is involved, who may benefit, and what relationships exist.
Jon supports better disclosure related to:
Support Grassroots Campaigns


Small-dollar fundraising from individuals
Community volunteers and endorsements
Neighborhood organizing and local engagement
Accessible public forums and open dialogue
Campaign models that depend on people, not corporate money

Large donors should not have a louder voice than residents who can only give a few dollars—or cannot afford to donate at all.
A grassroots victory can send a message beyond one election: residents are tired of pay-to-play, business-as-usual politics.
Independent Oversight and Enforcement



Ethics and campaign finance rules only matter when they are enforced.
Independent review of credible complaints
Meaningful penalties for violations
Clear reporting requirements
Protection against retaliation for people who report wrongdoing
Public accountability when rules are broken
Government works best when elected officials owe their loyalty to the people—not the people who write the biggest checks.




